Have any of the T.O.s or judges had a chance to look over the INAT faq on Dakka Dakka or Adeptus Windy City? I'm coming down with a half dozen or so from my club and Mike Early is bringing his crew, and we all got a first hand experience with the document at Adepticon

I'm not trying to ram it down anybody's throats, but in my opinion it does clarify many rules issues and streamline games. Either way, let us know whether to bring the faq binder with us.

If you still need terrain, I can bring a boxful or two. I have hills and buildings primarily. Let me know what you need most and maybe we can oblige...

Any and all terrain will be appreciated, this bubbled up to something way bigger than first intended... so the more the merrier.

As far as the FAQ, I have looked it over and agree with just about everything in there. I don't anticipate too many problems.

Worth any of the people judging things to look at though.

Everyone being mature and dealing with things themselves is the best bet though. If it's a game breaker we'll whip out an FAQ (or a fight to the death).

We'll have copies printed, or on a laptop.

So we are using the FAQ from the Adepticon website? If so are you making any changes to it for the tournament?

if train a leaves toledo at 10:15 am going 45 mph, and train b leaves new york city at 12:00 noon going 35 mph... which train gets to philadelphia first?

Not sure about the FAQ, I'll give it a look over.

If it's a lot of work to change it for our event, then screw it.

I've read through that before, it's pretty good in my opinion. They at least take a position on most if not all RAW debates, where no matter how hard you try to read it as written it isn't written well enough to do so.

Like firing between the legs of defilers and such.

I'd recommend using it, although the players around here will have to read through it beforehand to make sure it doesn't make a minor tweak to the way they are used to playing.

And while this won't be a problem cause I can't make it, but it has no 13th Co rulings.

Yeah I've read it, just want to re-read it.

I'll get back to that later.

OP updated with rules stuff.

Ok, let's go ahead and use the INAT FAQ.

Although everyone should remember that the FAQ is for AFTER a disagreement has occurred. Having everyone relearn how to play exactly like the INAT FAQ isn't completely reasonable (although I think most of us already do).

Just using it for argument settling will suffice.

It's now linked in the OP.

"Any kit bought beyond the regular profile equipment must be modeled."

Does this mean: example- like plague marines come with bolt pistols, but the actual models for p-marines are not modeled with pistols and so they would be fine without them being modeled?
Maybe I'm not catching onto this, just a clarification. thanks

Exactly Dume.

Some could have a bolter, some could have all three, some could have just a bolt pistol and close combat weapon.

If you were to buy a plasma gun for one of the plague marines, then it would have to modeled.

not bad...I take it this is the Tweaks to the regular rules??? I just printed it here at work.....My sup doesn't look too happy...lol 90 pages..BAH!

Not tweaks, clarifications so that arguments can be avoided.

Everyone should play the game they normally do, but refer to this for arguments.

got it big doggie!